Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀǽÄÇÏ ÁøÁ¤¹ý¿¡ °üÇÑ º¸È£ÀÚÀÇ Àνĵµ ¹× ¸¸Á·µµ Á¶»ç

A SURVEY OF GUARDIANS¡¯ COGNITION LEVEL AND SATISFACTION RATE ABOUT CONSCIOUS SEDATION

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 35±Ç 4È£ p.700 ~ 708
ÃÖÇÑÁÖ, ¹ÚÀçÈ«, ±è±¤Ã¶, ÃÖ¼ºÃ¶,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖÇÑÁÖ ( Choi Han-Ju ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸¼Ò
¹ÚÀçÈ« ( Park Jae-Hong ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è±¤Ã¶ ( Kim Kwang-Chul ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ¼ºÃ¶ ( Choi Sung-Chul ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â, º¸È£ÀÚ°¡ ¹Ù¶óº¸´Â ÁøÁ¤¹ýÀÇ ¸ð½À°ú À̸¦ ÅëÇØ º¸È£ÀÚµéÀÌ ¾ò°íÀÚ ÇÏ´Â °Í°ú ¿øÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹«¾ùÀÎÁö¸¦ ¾Ë°í º¸È£ÀÚµéÀÇ ³ôÀº ¸¸Á·µµ¿Í ´Éµ¿ÀûÀÎ ÇùÁ¶¸¦ À̲ø¾î ³»±â À§ÇÑ ¸ñÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃµµµÇ¾ú´Ù. 2006³â 7¿ùºÎÅÍ 9¿ù±îÁö °æÈñ´ëÇб³ º´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ ½Åȯ º¸È£ÀÚ 168¸í°ú ÀǽÄÇÏÁøÁ¤¹ýÀ» °æÇèÇÑ È¯ÀÚÀÇ º¸È£ÀÚ 50¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¼³¹®Á¶»ç¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼³¹®Áö´Â ½Åȯ º¸È£ÀÚ¿ë°ú ÁøÁ¤¹ý °æÇè º¸È£ÀÚ¿ëÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿© ¼³¹®À» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á¶»ç°á°ú ´ÙÀ½À» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 1. ÀϹÝÀûÀÎ ÀǽÄÇÏÁøÁ¤¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸ÀÇ Á¦°øÀÌ ÁÖ·Î ÁÖº¯ »ç¶÷µé¿¡ ÀÇÇØ Á¦ÇÑÀûÀÌ°í ¼öµ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾î Á³À¸¸ç, ºñÀü¹®ÀûÀÎ ¼ºÇâÀÓÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú°í, ¶ÇÇÑ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú Áø·á¿µ¿ª¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀǽÄÇÏÁøÁ¤¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤º¸ÀÇ Á¦°øÀÌ ºÎÁ·ÇÔÀ» ¾Ë ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 2. ½Åȯ º¸È£ÀÚ¿Í ÁøÁ¤¹ýÀ» °æÇèÇÑ È¯ÀÚ º¸È£ÀÚ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ȯ¾ÆÀÇ °øÆ÷°¨ °¨¼Ò¿¡ °¡Àå Å« °ü½ÉÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. 3. Çൿ °³¼±º¸´Ù´Â ȯ¾ÆÀÇ ½É¸®Àû °³¼±¿¡ ÀÖ¾î º¸È£ÀÚ°¡ ´À³¢´Â ¸¸Á·°¨ÀÌ Å©¸ç, µû¶ó¼­ ÁøÁ¤¹ý ½Ã Çൿ °³¼±ÀÇ ¸ñÀû º¸´Ù´Â ȯ¾ÆÀÇ °øÆ÷°¨ ¹× ºÒ¾È°¨ °¨¼Ò¿¡ ÃÊÁ¡À» µÎ¾î¾ß °Ú´Ù. 4. ½Åȯ º¸È£ÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ÁøÁ¤¹ýÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄÀÌ Á¤¸³µÇ¾î ÀÖÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í, ÁøÁ¤¹ýÀ» °æÇèÇÑ º¸È£ÀÚÀÇ °æ¿ì ¸ð¸£°Ú´Ù´Â °Í°ú ºÒ¾ÈÇÏ´Ù´Â ´ë´äÀÌ ´ëºÎºÐÀ» Â÷ÁöÇÏ¿© °æÇèÀ» ÇÏ¿´À½¿¡µµ ¿Ã¹Ù¸¥ ¾ÈÀü¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀνÄÀ» ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.

The aim of this study was to recognize guardians¡¯ desire and awareness on sedation, and to guide guardians¡¯ satisfaction and cooperation. Followings are the conclusion : 1. Information supply about conscious sedation were restrictive and insufficient. 2. Both first-visit guardians and guardians of sedated patients were interested in decrease of dental fear. 3. Both first-visit guardians and guardians of sedated patients were satisfied with psychological improvement better than behavior improvement. Therefore, decrease of patients¡¯ear and anxiety was essential. 4. Both first-visit guardians and guardians of sedated patients didn¡¯t recognize accurate safety of conscious sedation.

Å°¿öµå

ÇൿÁ¶Àý; ÀǽÄÇÏÁø; Á¤¹ý; º¸È£ÀÚ; Àνĵµ; ¸¸Á·µµ
Behavior management; Conscious sedation; Guardians; Cognition; Satisfaction

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI